Blogs

Chat with us

How to Benchmark Compensation Across 100+ Countries in 2025

Trying to understand salaries in a single country can be tricky. Multiply that by over 100 countries, and in 2025, the challenge only seems to grow. Series B and C startups, established IT firms, HR directors, or anyone tasked with global hiring all eventually hit the same wall: How much should I pay in this market?

It sounds like a simple question. It isn’t. Let’s look at how you can reliably compare compensation around the globe, and why doing this right can set your business on the path to success, compliance, and growth.

Why global compensation benchmarking matters (more than ever)

Benchmarking compensation internationally isn’t just about “what’s fair.” It’s about competing for the best people. It’s about expansion, stability, reducing risk, and building trust with new teams. If you misjudge market rates, a few things can go wrong:

  • You overpay and throw budgets off-kilter.
  • You underpay and lose out on top talent.
  • You break local laws and face legal issues.
  • Your teams feel undervalued, leading to churn and disengagement.

You need more than just data. You need context.

Global pay is a moving target, and it only gets faster.

Modern management consultancies like EWS Limited are repeatedly asked about the “right” amount for a particular job in a new country. But “right” changes. Often. The only way to manage this? Benchmark early. Benchmark often. But do it with rigor.

What makes benchmarking across 100+ countries so difficult

Let’s not sugarcoat it: most organizations struggle with this. Some of the biggest roadblocks include:

  • Patchwork of local rules – Wage laws, mandatory benefits, social security tax, working hours – individual countries rarely play by the same rulebook.
  • Currency shifts – Exchange rates can swing salaries overnight.
  • Cultural expectations – Beyond money, some regions value perks like housing, education support, or even family stipends above cash.
  • Hidden costs – Think about statutory bonuses, insurance, or indirect obligations, which are sometimes buried far from the headline salary.
  • Market benchmarks can change fast – Skill premiums (e.g. AI engineering) jump with demand, especially after a funding surge or governmental push.
  • Inflation and economic instability – Some emerging markets see rapid cost-of-living changes that don’t always map directly to wages.

Add to this the challenge of remote work, as the rise of global teams in 2025 is making borders matter less for some roles. Still, if you’re paying 2020 wages in 2025, you’re out of touch. Even country-specific guides from a few years ago can seem like they belong in a museum.

Colorful global salary comparison chart across various countries Step 1: define what you’re really benchmarking

Many first-timers overlook this. Are you looking at:

  • Base salary?
  • Total cash (base + variable bonus)?
  • Total rewards (cash + benefits + equity + perks)?
  • Employer’s total cost?
  • Employee’s net take-home?

If you’re doing payroll outsourcing through a firm like EWS, you’ll usually need the total employer cost. This may include taxes, social fees, insurance, and required bonuses. For talent acquisition teams, look also at total net compensation (what someone actually receives in their account after deductions). You don’t want talent walking away after the first payslip arrives, shocked by deductions you never explained.

Don’t compare apples and oranges. Define your basket.

Step 2: select your target jobs and levels

Don’t start by benchmarking everything. Begin with positions that will make the most difference:

  • Key technical roles (engineering, product, data science, cybersecurity)
  • Leadership and management roles
  • Functions that touch your business compliance, risk, or expansion goals

You may find, as outlined in employer of record global expansion, that your expansion hinges on just a few positions in the early stages.

Benchmark each role at the right career level. “Software Engineer” in Vietnam might mean three years of experience; in Canada, seven. Don’t skip this detail.

Step 3: gather and clean your data (hint: quality beats quantity)

This is where so many go wrong. A spreadsheet stuffed with salary “averages” from random sources won’t help. You need information that is:

  • Recent and relevant (2024/25 data, or as close as possible)
  • Specific to your industry and region
  • Analyzed for outliers, part-time vs. full-time confusion, errors, and double counting

Good sources for global compensation data often include:

  • Reputable salary surveys by industry groups or payroll specialists
  • Government labor reports (though these may lag a year or more)
  • Data from partners with experience in target markets
  • Guidance from EWS and similar experts, who can cross-check benchmarks with real placements

Don’t forget to adjust for purchasing power. Twenty thousand USD goes much further in India than in Denmark, so absolute numbers are less useful than you think.

It’s better to have accurate data for five countries than messy info for fifty.

Step 4: adjust for benefits, perks, and remote work

Base pay is only half the story. Total rewards now play a key role in job decisions everywhere. According to research by Stephany et al. on AI jobs in the United States, non-monetary benefits like remote work or parental leave made roles more attractive and actually boosted cash salary levels by 12% to 20%, reflecting intense competition for talent and higher expectations of what an offer should include.

Globally, expectations can differ; in Germany, extra vacation days are a prized benefit. In Singapore, a good healthcare allowance boosts candidate interest. In Brazil, companies may need to contribute statutory transportation and meal vouchers. Failing to account for these extras will set you back.

Step 5: understand legal and compliance requirements

Hiring blindly is risky. Many countries require:

  • Minimum wages (national or sector-specific)
  • Guaranteed bonuses (13th month, holiday or end-of-year)
  • Mandatory contributions (health, pension, insurance)
  • Strict rules on overtime, leave, or severance

Non-compliance can turn a great hire into a costly mistake.

Review regularly updated regulatory resources. The compliance checklist for international hiring in 2025 can be your starting point, but always double-check for new developments in each target country.

Step 6: correct for cost of living and purchasing power

This catches many businesses off guard. Suppose you want to pay a remote software engineer in Thailand the same as one in London. Would that seem generous or odd? Maybe a bit of both.

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) explains why $50,000 USD in Nigeria or Philippines leads to a very different lifestyle than the same sum in Sweden. Use an up-to-date cost-of-living calculator or consult with multipliers provided in global remuneration reports. Don’t standardize all compensation on USD values without adjustments.

  • Market-competitive pay should cover local costs and attract the right tier of talent in each market.
  • If hiring globally, consider location-agnostic ranges, but balance equity and perception.

In 2025, many candidates now demand transparency on why they’re paid as they are relative to peers in other countries. Be ready to explain your logic.

Diverse business team in a video meeting with international backgrounds Step 7: review macroeconomic factors and future trends

Geo-political shocks, technological disruption (like the continuing AI wave), and abrupt regulatory changes can all affect compensation. For instance:

  • A spike in demand for skilled AI engineers can push salaries up in a matter of weeks.
  • Sudden changes in tax or visa regimes impact not just expats, but local workers too.
  • Inflation may erode real pay, leading to higher expectations or annual adjustments.

Setting salary benchmarks in 2025 isn’t “once and done.” It’s a process of steady fine-tuning.

Today’s offer is tomorrow’s baseline.

Step 8: include equity and long-term incentives

Especially for startups in high-growth phases, equity is often as valuable (or more so) than cash in certain markets. But the appetite for equity varies:

  • In the US or UK, employees may appreciate stock options or RSUs.
  • In some Asian or South American markets, cash or short-term rewards trump shares, at least for now.
  • Legal structures also affect whether equity can even be distributed efficiently or at all.

Carefully explain any offers—sometimes a $10,000 stock grant is worth less than a $5,000 bonus, depending on how talent in a particular region views risk versus reward.

Step 9: validate your numbers on the ground

Numbers are only as reliable as your local verification. What looks perfect on a spreadsheet can feel wildly off to candidates or managers in-country.

How do you reality-check global benchmarks?

  • Run pilot offers and see market reaction.
  • Work with a partner like EWS, who have in-market networks to cross-check “hard data” with local sentiment.
  • Ask hiring managers and existing team members for periodic feedback: “Is this pay competitive for your friends in similar roles?”
  • Review exit interview data for any patterns about “not enough pay” or “better benefits elsewhere.”

Keep your ear to the ground. Small complaints are often early warnings.

Step 10: document, update, and communicate benchmarks

In global organizations, process matters. Benchmarks should be documented, reviewed, and shared (even if not all detail is public). Consider:

  • Creating a shared online dashboard of country-level bands.
  • Scheduling benchmark reviews quarterly or after every country expansion.
  • Training HR and managers on how to explain ranges to teams transparently.

Make review and communication part of your culture. It builds trust and preempts confusion.

Payroll data dashboard on laptop screen Common pitfalls in global compensation benchmarking

  • Forgetting about compliance: If you pay under the legal minimum, you risk penalties and broken trust.
  • Assuming data translates: “Average” is misleading. Median, quartile, and real current offers count for more.
  • Relying only on internal peer feedback: Your teams might not have the full market view, especially post-pandemic.
  • Underestimating non-cash items: Sometimes, a flexible remote policy is a bigger draw than a bigger paycheck.
  • Lagging on updates: Fast-moving industries (think cybersecurity, AI) require near real-time review cycles.
  • Neglecting local communication: Push your benchmarks through management layers. Local hires can spot mismatches before they become problems.

If you’re already deep into benchmarking, check your process against these and course-correct where needed. Sometimes, you need to rework your approach with outside expertise, especially if expanding quickly or into unfamiliar regions.

  • share on Facebook
  • share on Twitter
  • share on LinkedIn

Related Blogs