Blogs

How International Mobility Drives Growth: Key Insights and Stats

When top talent crosses borders, fresh perspectives meet local expertise. That spark? It can turn a company’s ordinary growth story into something bigger, faster, and a little unpredictable. Right now, more organizations are realizing that international mobility isn’t just a “nice to have” for HR or a lucky break for adventurous employees. It’s starting to look a lot like a main engine of global business growth, full stop.

But as this trend builds, it gets more complex. The numbers don’t lie: rising costs, faltering assignments, tech that doesn’t always deliver, and the personal challenges people face when moving their lives far from home, these aren’t just little bumps in the road. They’re serious hurdles. Still, the payoff? It can be big. More on why, and how, below.

Why mobility is moving up the agenda

Go back just a few years, and the old playbook treated international mobility a bit like a paperwork headache for legal, HR, and payroll. Assignments were about filling gaps, or meeting urgent in-market needs. Now, according to the latest ECA International data, most organizations say mobility is a “strategic requirement.” They use it to:

• Transfer hard-won expertise across borders
• Fast-track potential senior managers (think tomorrow’s C-suite)
• Build a network of future leaders who get how the world really works
• Balance skills gaps, literally overnight, wherever they appear

There’s another twist: companies competing for Series B and C funding, or those scaling after a recent capital injection, now treat international hiring as a sign that they’re serious contenders on the world stage. Expanding your workforce globally, with the right structure, usually isn’t about cost-cutting. It’s about assembling the right minds in the right place, when it matters most.

The numbers that matter: mobility stats in 2024

The story gets more interesting when you see the hard data. International mobility comes packed with a blend of progress and pain-points. Let’s pull apart the numbers:

• Annual assignment costs are climbing steadily. According to recent findings, average total annual costs hit USD 9,800 for long-term assignments. For short-term assignments, it’s USD 8,700. A few years ago, this would have sent a ripple through most finance departments. Today, it’s often accepted as a necessary investment — but not everyone is happy about it.
• Currency shifts can force sudden budget shocks. In a 2023 report, the Argentine peso’s 54% collapse against the dollar meant that mobility budgets had to be redrawn almost overnight. It’s a reminder: numbers on paper can change midway through an assignment, not just at the start.
• Around 60% of global mobility leaders say healthcare costs are especially hard to predict when posting talent to places like the US, where employer insurance premiums jumped 7.3% last year. Knowing what you’re really signing up for, financially, is more slippery than you might hope.

Growth comes with new risks, and new rewards.

Assignment failures: it’s not just about the money

It’d be easy to say that better pay and perks keep people happy abroad, but the stats disagree. The latest ECA International survey is blunt: while money and paperwork matter, the personal side can make or break an assignment.

• Family-related issues are now the second most common cause of assignment failure.
• More than 25% of failed international assignments happen because an employee’s spouse or children struggle to settle in, or their emotional support system frays.
• Trouble adjusting to life—language, culture, schooling, even weather—can outweigh the most generous compensation packages.

What’s the lesson? Companies are waking up to the need for wider support than just pay bumps or signing bonuses. From practical relocation help (school searches, language lessons, housing advice) to emotional support, it takes a holistic approach. The data is clear: if the family isn’t happy, the assignment will probably falter.

Enterprise Workforce Solutions (EWS) has seen this pattern up close, both with startups entering new regions and global IT firms moving skilled teams. It’s why their solutions, such as exit and re-entry planning, family support, and on-the-ground orientation, have become core to long-term assignment success—not just optional extras.

Rising costs, slow tech, and the matter of ROI

Here’s where things get messier. As mobility becomes more central, the costs rise – not just for logistics, but also for extra support, compliance checks, and tailored benefit plans. But do these costs pay off? That’s…hard to measure, according to those same ECA International reports.

A recent Benivo survey found that 62% of companies want smarter technology platforms to help track and control these costs. The demand is high for real-time insights and automated workflow systems, but adoption is choppy. Even when technology helps trim some expenses, most teams admit they still struggle to map out a real return on investment.

Real growth means seeing beyond the line items.

It’s not just about spreadsheets and receipts. True ROI from mobility comes from:

• Developing senior leaders with global perspective
• Embedding hard-to-find skills in local teams, fast
• Sparking new ideas and approaches by mixing backgrounds
• Building a culture that attracts “borderless thinkers”

But when surveyed, only 3% of companies claim to be fully satisfied with their mobility tech (ECA International, 2021). The vast majority are left wrestling with half-solutions: spreadsheets that don’t sync with HR software, dashboards that lag, and poor data flow between finance and people teams.

Larger global mobility programs do tend to get more out of their tools, according to that same survey. It suggests that scale helps justify investment in the tech stack, but also that smaller and mid-sized firms are often stuck with more manual, back-and-forth processes.

Tech hopes (and frustrations): ai’s cautious roll-out

Mention AI, and you might expect a rush of automation in HR and global mobility. The reality is more hesitant, and sometimes a little anticlimactic. Despite AI’s high profile in other business areas, global mobility functions seem wary. A minority have really woven AI into their assignment management, due to:

• Complex, shifting compliance risks (one wrong move can be expensive)
• Sensitivity around personal data and privacy during cross-border moves
• Doubts about how accurately AI can understand “human” factors, like cultural adaptation struggles or family challenges

Of the companies surveyed in ECA International’s study, just a sliver have moved past the pilot phase. Most want to wait and see how things shake out for others first. But the mood is watchful — with a growing sense that, if a truly reliable and user-friendly mobility tech emerges, adoption could quickly snowball.

Part of the struggle is bridging tech with humanity. Smart dashboards can track costs, flag risks, and automate approvals, but they don’t (yet) help a spouse find the right school, or ease a manager’s culture shock. The “human equation” stays at the center.

Leadership growth and hierarchy: a human network

Skills can be taught; perspective takes experience. This is why many companies now use international assignments to “pressure test” potential leaders. The executive who navigates a new culture, motivates a cross-border team, and adapts to government curveballs is a much safer future bet for higher roles.

Enterprise Workforce Solutions (EWS) sees this firsthand, especially in fast-scaling IT businesses and startups eyeing new capital rounds. The ability to drop a high-potential manager into a complex new environment—and watch them either thrive or adapt—helps shape decisions about promotion, succession, and business development strategy in ways that a resume never could.

The ripple effect? When people return home with broader perspectives, they become the architects of international projects, from managing overseas launches to handling compliance surprises. They can bridge head office urgency with local know-how—which, according to several mobility managers EWS consulted, is worth far more than the cost of a ticket, housing, or a moving van.

The upside also includes rapid team learning: by sending a specialist abroad, suddenly an entire local workforce gets access to fresh talent, new processes, and different ways of solving old challenges. This approach, covered in EWS’s guidance on managing overseas projects, flips the script from isolated knowledge silos to shared, scalable growth.

Beyond numbers: mobility and diversity

A not-so-small benefit of international mobility is what it does for team diversity and inclusion. People who work across borders tend to bring broader thinking and challenge group-think at home. It’s not about hiring “diversity statistics,” it’s about inviting in an extra layer of real-world experience.

As argued in discussions of diversity in hiring strategy, mixing backgrounds isn’t a box-ticking approach. It’s a path to building resilience, better project management, and even more creative products.

But it’s worth mentioning, too, that international mobility can help companies navigate—sometimes by accident—a shifting regulatory picture. Think EU labor law changes, or sudden tax treaties. With in-house mobility knowledge (and partners like EWS offering company formation and compliance services), the transitions are smoother.

Embracing the hybrid era

Mobility isn’t just about long relocations anymore. Hybrid working, work-from-anywhere trends, and distributed teams have given the whole concept a shake-up. Now, short-term assignments, project-based moves, and even “commuter” expat roles are on the rise.

This shift presents new demands: faster onboarding, tighter compliance controls, and a stronger need for digitized (but human-centered) processes. The playbook is changing—and anyone still using manual, paperwork-heavy workflows is feeling the pinch.

For companies rethinking how to hire and move people in the hybrid age, EWS’s own take on hiring in a hybrid world is a useful reference. The line between “home office” and “overseas assignment” is getting blurrier by the month.