Blogs

Chat with us

Europe hiring “hacks” that let agencies place talent without setting up entities

I often look at global hiring and marvel at how agencies now move skilled professionals across Europe without the need to set up a branch or a company in each country. For years, I watched businesses wrestle with paperwork, tax codes, and countless local regulations. Yet now, with practical solutions like those I encounter at EWS Limited, it has become far more realistic for agencies and growing firms to hire in Europe with flexible arrangements instead of brick-and-mortar setups. In this article, I want to share the main “hacks” that let agencies and international firms place talent in European countries without forming legal entities, while also addressing the risks, legalities, and genuine business impact these methods bring.

Why are more agencies hiring abroad without setting up local entities?

A few months ago, I spoke to an ambitious HR Director struggling to understand if her company truly needed to set up a subsidiary in Sweden just to hire two developers based in Stockholm. After years watching businesses like hers, I have noticed these main drivers:

  • Reducing administrative headaches and overhead
  • Speeding up talent acquisition for cross-border projects
  • Testing new markets or projects without long-term commitments
  • Retaining talent who wish to work remotely or relocate across Europe
  • Remaining agile against fluctuating client needs or funding cycles

According to Eurostat’s report on part-time employment in the EU, a significant portion of European workers are either non-EU citizens or EU nationals living abroad, showing just how international the workforce has become. This trend pressures agencies to solve cross-border hiring in smart ways.

The old way vs. the new way: Setting up entities or going entity-free?

If I think back to the early 2000s, almost every agency that wanted to place talent in France or Germany would start by incorporating a local office. This meant months waiting for registrations, putting together legal representation, finding accountants, renting office space, and so on. But today, things look quite different.

  • Traditional: Open a local company, register for tax and social security, manage compliance, run a payroll.
  • Modern: Use EWS Limited or a similar model, and rely on outsourced workforce or employment solutions that shelter you from entity-based headaches.

Agencies and companies can now enter new labor markets, place staff directly, and run payroll efficiently by passing much of the local burden to third-party specialists. As a result, entity-free models drive faster scaling and lower up-front investment.

How Europe’s complex regulations make entity-free hiring attractive

I will always remember one of my first experiences with cross-border hiring. The company opted to open a Polish subsidiary just to employ two software testers. By the time the first payslip was issued, legal fees exceeded three months of their salaries. Looking back, this was not unusual. Today, things have changed because each European country still has its own tangled regulations, but ways to sidestep these with smart legal channels have become more common. Here’s what makes things so complicated:

  • Every country has unique payroll, tax, and labor rules
  • Localized paperwork is language-dependent and often requires local representation
  • Tax authority scrutiny of “permanent establishment” rules
  • Social security coverage and contributions vary by location

This patchwork means that agency leaders are attracted to alternatives that don’t require lengthy incorporation, but still guarantee compliance, worker protection, and payroll accuracy as expected by local authorities.

Breaking down the main methods: How agencies actually place talent without legal entities

Throughout my work and research, I’ve seen four practical approaches for hiring in Europe without needing a dedicated local company. The preferred method depends on project scope, duration, and risk appetite. Below, I detail what these are and how they work in real projects.

1. Employer of record (EOR) arrangements

If there’s a single method that has changed international workforce management overnight, it’s the Employer of Record. I find this process the most reliable for agencies placing full-time or long-term staff. In short, an EOR like EWS Limited assumes legal employment responsibility for a worker in the destination country, handling contracts, compliance, payroll, and terminations.

  • The EOR is the legal employer in the eyes of local authorities
  • The agency remains in charge of project control and daily management
  • Employment contracts and labor protections are binding and local
  • Local payroll, tax, and contributions are managed centrally

For example, EWS Limited offers Employer of Record services tailored for Denmark, Sweden, Ukraine, and Serbia, which means agencies can rely on experts to manage all statutory obligations, eliminating the need for a legal entity in Denmark, or using references for Swedish hiring, Ukrainian projects, or Serbia placements. This is the backbone of “entity-free” hiring in Europe.

Agencies stay agile, contracts stay compliant.

2. Professional Employer Organisation (PEO) collaborations

Second only to EOR, PEOs handle the administrative side of employment, sometimes co-employing staff and managing payroll with the agency. This is common for project teams or contractors in IT, fintech, and creative industries.

  • Employment relationship is often shared or split legally
  • Payroll, benefits, and HR paperwork covered by the PEO
  • Good fit for medium-term deployments or rapid scaling

If you’re curious about differences between PEO and EOR, I recommend checking out the 2025 update on PEO vs EOR, which compares these two modes of employment, with insights for managers making their first overseas hire.

3. Direct contractor engagement

Short-term or highly specialised projects may not need an employment contract, making direct freelancing or contractor models attractive. Agencies can engage professionals as independent service providers under a B2B contract, but this comes with caveats—misclassification is a real risk, especially under European rules.

  • Fast and flexible for temporary needs
  • Less paperwork, no employment responsibility
  • Risk of “disguised employment” investigations if the worker acts as an employee

For instance, in some countries, using a contractor continuously for years could be viewed as an employment relationship. I advise agencies to seek legal advice and understand where direct contracting is safe and where it might attract penalties.

4. Temporary agency workforce partnerships

Some agencies partner with local temporary staffing firms, which “host” the employees and then assign them to work at the client’s site. This method is common in areas with high seasonal demand, e.g., hospitality or manufacturing. While it sidesteps incorporation, locally licensed partner agencies must be used, and profit margins can be lower.

  • Local temp agency becomes the employer of record
  • Work stays compliant with local laws
  • Agency focus remains on recruitment and assigning staff

This setup is often faster than starting a company but usually suits only certain industries or roles.

How the legal landscape affects entity-free hiring choices

Every time I work on cross-border employment, the first question is always: “Is it legal to hire without a company in this country?” The answer depends on three core factors:

  • The type of work and whether a worker is genuinely a contractor or employee
  • Which company is legally responsible for wages, tax, benefits, and worker protections
  • Whether local regulations require licenses or registered entities for recruitment

In most European countries, hiring through an EOR or compliant contractor setup is fully legal. Where companies sometimes go astray is by ignoring local “permanent establishment” laws or misclassifying workers, exposing the agency to fines, back pay, or reclassification.

My own practice has taught me that only using trusted, experienced intermediaries ensures compliance. With heavily scrutinized countries like Germany or France, meticulous attention to employment contracts and payroll is non-negotiable.

Mistakes agencies make when hiring talent across Europe without entities

Every year, I see agency teams fall into these classic traps. Avoid them, and your placements will be much smoother and less risky.

1. Not understanding local worker protections

Europe takes worker protection seriously—contracts, sick leave, maternity leave, social insurance, and terminations, all with strict legal backing. Using a standard contract can leave you exposed to claims, as laws can override any agreement if protections are missing.

2. Ignoring the “permanent establishment” risk

If you have people working in a country full-time and making money for your agency there, the tax authority could say you have a hidden branch and demand retroactive company taxes. Structures like the EWS Limited EOR model are designed to shield you from this risk, but it needs careful management.

3. Misclassifying “contractors” who are actually de facto employees

Agencies sometimes hire long-term staff as “contractors” to avoid employment laws, but this can backfire if authorities believe they were really employees. Penalties are heavy—always check each country’s rules on allowable contractor arrangements.

4. Failing to keep up with changing regulations

Regulations change every year and can vary dramatically even within regions. For example, according to recent Eurostat findings, employment rates vary between European regions, reflecting local economic and legal factors. Entities like EWS Limited make it easier to stay ahead of these shifts with up-to-date support.

5. Not considering social security coordination across borders

Workers who move between countries or work remotely from another country must have proper social security coverage and contributions, both to protect them and to avoid double taxation. EU rules help, but each country has variations worth checking in advance.

Think global, but act in line with local laws.

Navigating payroll, payments, and taxes without a local company

When I help clients on cross-border hires, payroll is often the area that sparks the most concern. Each country asks for specific payroll calculations, and paying into local bank accounts or calculating the right taxes can be daunting. Here’s how agencies handle payroll in a borderless hiring model:

  • Use an EOR/PEO to manage all local deductions, benefits, and filings
  • Centralise payments in multi-currency payroll platforms
  • Receive reports and pay a single invoice, with the service provider distributing funds
  • Maintain transparent and auditable records in the agency’s home country

This arrangement means agencies can expand their workforce as if they had a local office, but without any permanent presence, registration, or local bank account. It’s one of the biggest reasons the EOR approach is skyrocketing in popularity.

How to pick the right talent placement approach: Decision checklist

In my experience, the best approach depends on your project’s specific requirements, level of risk you are willing to take, and the size of your potential footprint in the country. Consider these factors before choosing a solution:

  • Is the placement long-term, full-time, or a short project?
  • Do you need employment contracts or is a B2B partnership enough?
  • What are the tax risks in the country of work?
  • How important is local compliance and benefits for the role?
  • Are you planning to hire more people in the country soon?

For long-term or multiple placements, I strongly recommend the EOR model as the most stable. For short-term projects, direct contracting may be fine, provided you consult legal guidance first.

An example from the IT industry: How a series B company built a team in Sweden

Some months ago, I guided a Series B IT company ready to expand into Sweden but hesitant to create a Swedish entity for just five engineers. By partnering with EWS Limited on an EOR arrangement, they hired all five engineers with permanent contracts under Swedish law, managed payroll in SEK, and provided benefits equal to local peers. No new company, no local office, and full compliance. They could focus on their product launch while the EOR managed every legal and HR process. This kind of agility is game-changing for growth companies.

Addressing the talent crunch and skills shortages with entity-free hiring

Europe faces one of its toughest skills shortages in decades, with 80% of employers unable to find the skills they need, according to recent data from Eurofound. For agencies, this means reaching beyond borders for the best talent—without waiting to register companies for every placement. The entity-free model enables teams to source developers, cybersecurity experts, and project managers from right across the continent, adapting quickly to market needs. Not only does this keep the business moving, it also supports talent from underrepresented regions to join pan-European teams.

Matching workforce mobility and company goals

I believe mobility is more than just moving workers—it’s about aligning company vision with the best talent, regardless of location. Whether you are a relationship manager at a multinational or a founder of a startup, the freedom to hire flexibly provides an edge. EWS Limited, as a partner, offers tailored consulting for each country, covering everything from legal compliance checks to payroll outsourcing and complete workforce relocation support.

What makes a successful Europe hiring strategy without an entity?

Based on what I’ve seen, the agencies and startups that thrive in this new landscape focus on:

  • Structuring hires through a trusted EOR/PEO partner with deep local expertise
  • Prioritising legal compliance and worker protections as part of standard practice
  • Staying up-to-date with regulatory changes in target countries
  • Using agile workforce management tools to centralise onboarding, payroll, and reporting
  • Planning talent pipelines for scale, not just short-term needs

Above all, the willingness to seek expert guidance—like what EWS Limited provides—ensures risks are kept low and growth is sustainable across Europe’s shifting labor landscape.

Conclusion: Time to hire talent in Europe—without building a company first

For agencies and growing firms, the opportunity to hire across Europe without forming a company in every new market is no longer a pipe dream. EOR, PEO, and contract-based approaches have made borderless hiring quick, compliant, and cost-effective. The strategies I’ve shared above reflect the best practices I see among successful agencies today—practices that EWS Limited has refined in real-world projects over years. If you want to discover more about how to streamline your own European workforce expansion, reach out to EWS Limited to see how our solutions empower you to hire talent anywhere your ambitions take you.

Frequently asked questions

What is hiring in Europe without an entity?

Hiring in Europe without an entity means placing a worker in a European country without forming a legal company or branch office there. This is achieved through third-party partners such as Employer of Record (EOR) services, Professional Employer Organisations (PEOs), or legal direct contracting models. This approach lets agencies or companies operate in a country, manage local payroll, and comply with labor laws, all without the burden of company registration.

How can agencies hire without a local entity?

Agencies hire without forming a local entity by partnering with specialist providers who take on the employment and compliance responsibilities in the destination country. The most common solutions are EOR arrangements, where the service provider becomes the legal employer, and PEO services, where HR administration is outsourced with shared responsibility. For short projects, agencies sometimes engage contractors directly, but care must be taken to avoid misclassification.

Is it legal to hire in Europe without an entity?

Yes, it is legal to hire in Europe without an entity, as long as you use approved channels like EOR, PEO, or compliant contractor agreements. The primary risk is breaking “permanent establishment” rules or misclassifying workers as contractors. Working with experienced partners like EWS Limited helps keep agencies on the right side of local laws and regulations.

What are the benefits of entity-free hiring?

The main benefits include: quicker entry into new markets, lower upfront and operational costs, reduced administrative and legal burdens, and more agility to place or remove talent as projects change. It also helps businesses manage risk, maintain compliance, and trial new regions without long-term commitments or costly local company setups.

How much does hiring without an entity cost?

Costs depend on the method used. EOR and PEO solutions typically charge a monthly fee per worker, which can include payroll, contracts, and HR support (sometimes between 5% to 20% of gross salary). Contractor models carry fewer fixed costs but may hold legal risks. Compared to the expense and time of forming a local entity, these solutions almost always provide a more affordable, flexible alternative, especially for initial hires or project-based placements.

  • share on Facebook
  • share on Twitter
  • share on LinkedIn

Related Blogs