Blogs

Chat with us

Ad Hoc IT vs MSPs vs Platforms: Choosing the Right IT Approach

Choosing how we manage IT shapes how our businesses adapt, stay secure, and support growth. As organizations expand, especially through international hiring or scaling after funding rounds, the right approach becomes not just a technical decision but a strategic one. Today, we compare three main approaches: ad hoc IT, managed service providers (MSPs), and IT management platforms. Each has merits, and risks. Let’s take a practical look at how each impacts companies in fast-moving sectors like tech, SaaS, and innovation-driven firms.

How small companies typically start: Ad hoc IT reality

Growth moves fast, especially after new funding rounds or first international hires. Most early-stage companies aren’t thinking about IT complexity. Our observations at EWS Limited and with clients across many sectors show a common pattern: the first laptops get bought on an as-needed basis, software accounts are shared, and there’s little formal tracking of devices or user permissions. Someone, often in HR or operations, tracks purchases in a spreadsheet (if at all). Passwords are shared over email or messaging apps. Policies? Often written down after something goes wrong.

This early-stage approach feels easy, until it suddenly isn’t.

Founders and managers value this flexibility. When a new person joins, we grab another laptop or spin up a new SaaS account. There’s no waiting on approvals. Money isn’t spent on “overhead.”

Where ad hoc IT hits the wall

The cracks appear once more people join. Devices go missing or cannot be located. Account access lingers for ex-employees. No one knows who has admin rights to critical software. HR spends hours chasing IT issues during onboarding and offboarding. Security risk becomes real. According to recent data from ISACA surveys, executive leaders recognize the value of routine IT risk assessments, but inconsistent frequency leaves gaps, a risk that compounds with growth.

Ad hoc IT provides speed at first but makes risk management and reporting nearly impossible as teams scale. The problem: hidden costs in lost time, compliance headaches, and remediation after a breach or error. Shared passwords and missing audits leave sensitive data exposed, increasing business risk further, as reported by ASIS International research on business disruption causes.

MBiota: A story of ad hoc IT strain

When mBiota grew from 10 to 55 employees in a year, scaling pains emerged quickly. Onboarding took a week per new hire, since someone had to hunt down devices, get software access approved, and chase old account owners. Equipment was sometimes bought last-minute at premium rates, costing double what it should. The HR team, with no IT background, became the de facto helpline, spending 15% of their time dealing with laptop and login issues rather than onboarding or supporting their teams. In six months, what began as fast and light became a tug of war with day-to-day operations and business goals.

Managed service providers: Professional IT, for a price

As the team grows and IT challenges multiply, many companies look for help from managed service providers (MSPs). These are third-party vendors who take over regular IT operations for a recurring, predictable fee. Their service typically covers network monitoring, cybersecurity, help desk support, software updates, and sometimes procurement.

The reason for this shift is clear. Technology.org highlights that MSPs turn unpredictable IT expenses into predictable monthly operating costs. This model can be more cost-effective than a full internal IT team, particularly for Series B or C startups, as well as established tech companies targeting international expansion or needing to keep internal headcounts lean.

Here’s what a typical MSP engagement includes:

  • Remote monitoring of networks, servers, and devices
  • 24/7 cybersecurity protection and patching
  • Help desk for employee tech issues
  • Software license management
  • Regular IT reporting for executives

What you get, and what you lose

On the positive side, MSPs offer deep expertise and round-the-clock technical response. There’s no need to hire and train in-house IT staff. This is particularly appealing for startups or international teams distributed across time zones. For companies managing remote or globally mobile workforces, like those using EWS for global mobility or employer-of-record services, MSPs can bridge skill and compliance gaps in new countries.

The tradeoffs appear in the details. MSPs require contracts that specify the scope of work. Handling anything outside the contract, adding new software, setting up international devices, or quick policy changes, often means extra charges, contract amendments, or ticket queues. Some companies feel a loss of direct control over who does what, and wait times for urgent changes can clash with the agile pace required by growth-focused firms. The cost structure, while predictable, can increase quickly as staff count grows, since many MSPs charge per user or device.

Convenience brings peace of mind, but sometimes at the cost of agility.

Why some leadership teams hesitate

Many HR and operations leaders share that while MSPs bring much-needed technical skill and reduce pressure on non-IT teams, they face frustration with rigid ticketing systems and project delays. This misalignment can slow down onboarding, limit experimentation with new tools, and undermine the sense of flexibility valued in entrepreneurial cultures.

In our experience working with global mobility managers and C-suite teams, the MSP model suits organizations comfortable with handing over IT decision-making. For those wanting more self-service, customization, or direct day-to-day oversight, the next category, IT management platforms, often fits better.

IT management platforms: Automation meets control

Recent years have seen the rise of IT management platforms built specifically for small and mid-sized businesses. These cloud-based tools automate routine IT tasks, centralize device and app management, and allow non-technical staff, often in HR, operations, or partner management, to handle onboarding, offboarding, security, and access reviews from a single dashboard.

These platforms put power back into the hands of business owners and people teams. With a few clicks, we can assign laptops, create user accounts across multiple SaaS systems, and enforce compliance, no IT expertise required. This is especially helpful for organizations aiming for centralized, global workforce management, as illustrated in articles like the benefits of centralized global workforce management.

What gets easier with platforms?

Among the features that matter most to our clients:

  • Automated onboarding and offboarding workflows
  • Device tracking and wiping remotely
  • Centralized visibility into app usage and access
  • Built-in role-based permissions and compliance-relevant audit trails
  • Reminders and checklists for HR-led processes

Most platforms charge a fixed monthly rate, sometimes with basic plans free for teams below a certain size. While they enhance control, they still require someone, an office manager, HR leader, or even a founder, to initiate tasks or monitor dashboards regularly.

For organizations with even a small IT presence, platforms free IT staff for “big projects” (strategy, expansion, policy) rather than day-to-day setup or troubleshooting. This ability to split routine tasks from strategic work can be the difference between IT supporting the business and holding it back.

What you still have to manage

IT management platforms are powerful, but they aren’t “set and forget.” Monitoring, process initiation, and periodic audits remain our responsibility. As ISACA’s survey on risk assessment frequency shows, regular checks matter for ongoing safety and compliance. These platforms support, but don’t replace, a culture that values IT hygiene and proactive risk management.

Automation amplifies discipline, not laziness.

We see that companies scaling into new countries, as described in guidance around how to open a company abroad, benefit from a platform approach. It enables faster setup for international hires, less reliance on external IT, and easier compliance monitoring, all from a distance.

Comparing the three IT approaches

To decide which approach matches our stage and strategy, we need to understand where they fit:

  • Ad hoc IT works when speed is everything and headcount is under control. Once device and account sprawl sets in, risk rises fast.
  • MSPs deliver expertise and security without growing IT salaries, but cost and control quickly become concerns as scaling accelerates.
  • IT management platforms let internal teams, even without technical backgrounds, handle core tasks with less friction, supporting self-reliance and cost control for distributed workforces.

The “tipping point” factors

Based on our work with global mobility and HR directors, the decision is shaped by these questions:

  1. How many employees (and devices) do we need to support?
  2. How rapidly are we onboarding or offboarding staff, especially across borders?
  3. Do we have IT skills internally, or are leaders “moonlighting” as IT support?
  4. Is strict compliance (data, payroll, access) a top concern, for investors or local regulators?
  5. Do we want to stay flexible, or are we comfortable with a more “locked in” arrangement?

Answering these shapes the right IT model. Our own guidance on legal risks and compliance highlights how fragmented IT approaches expose companies to issues in audits and due diligence, both by investors and labor authorities.

Integrations, partnerships, and the future

Today’s business environment rewards companies that adapt IT choices to their structure, funding stage, and locations. For example, Justworks, a well-known workforce platform, offers integration with the Electric IT management platform. This supports companies in simplifying device setup, cloud management, and IT security, while scaling confidently across all 50 states. It shows a trend: the best IT approach depends on how closely the solution matches operating realities.

With cross-border hiring, especially for first expansions into new countries, aligning IT and HR functions becomes even more important. For more insights, our post on PEO vs. EOR for overseas hiring helps map HR and IT together for compliance and agility.

IT and business strategy: Two sides of the same coin

Whatever IT approach we select, connection with our broader business strategy is the differentiator. For example, when evaluating how to organize HR internationally, as discussed in our guide to a scalable HR strategy, we see that companies who align IT, HR, and legal processes scale with fewer interruptions, less shadow IT, and smoother expansion.

It’s no longer enough to “patch later.” Proactive IT strategy is risk management, employee experience, and growth planning, all at once.

Conclusion: Where do we go from here?

The path from ad hoc IT to MSP or a management platform is inevitable for every growing business. Each option comes with its own risks, costs, and payoffs. The decision should match our growth ambitions, worker locations, compliance risks, and appetite for control or outsourcing. As we saw with mBiota and many companies partnering with EWS Limited, early choices set the tone for later resilience and speed.

It pays to step back, map our priorities, and match them to a path that offers not just technical answers, but true business advantage. If you’re planning a new international office or ramping up hiring, talk with us at EWS Limited about aligning your workforce solutions, IT model, and growth targets. We help you connect the dots, and keep moving forward with confidence.

Frequently asked questions

What is Ad Hoc IT support?

Ad hoc IT support means handling technical tasks as they arise without a structured system or dedicated team. Small companies usually buy devices and set up software on the fly, have staff share passwords, and track everything through simple spreadsheets or shared documents. It works for quick setup but quickly becomes difficult and risky when more people and tools are added.

What does an MSP do?

A managed service provider (MSP) is a third-party company that manages your IT systems remotely for a set monthly fee. Services usually include cybersecurity, network monitoring, help desk support, and regular updates. MSPs bring expertise and stability, letting you focus on your main business. However, you must follow their processes, and extra work may lead to higher costs.

Which is better: MSP or platform?

MSPs are best when you want IT handled fully by outside specialists, ideal if you lack in-house expertise and are comfortable with less direct control. Platforms, on the other hand, give more day-to-day visibility and let HR or operations manage onboarding, security, and compliance without complex tickets. The choice depends on your need for flexibility, control, and cost management as you grow.

How much does Ad Hoc IT cost?

Ad hoc IT often appears less expensive up front because there are no monthly fees or dedicated staff. Over time, hidden costs add up, lost devices, security fixes, expensive last-minute purchases, and wasted time for HR or managers solving technical issues. As the team grows, cost and risk rise quickly compared to structured options like platforms or MSPs.

When should I switch IT approaches?

Most companies reach a tipping point when manual tracking no longer works, employee count rises, or compliance demands grow, usually around 15-30 staff or after a big round of hiring. At this stage, onboarding slows, support issues multiply, and risk of errors or lost data increases. If these signals appear, it’s time to consider moving to an MSP or IT management platform to regain control and security.

  • share on Facebook
  • share on Twitter
  • share on LinkedIn

Related Blogs